Netflix Follies: Let Me In, Cargo, Pandorum, Predators, more

FOLLIES

 complete viewing  ♠ partial viewing   television series 

letmein2drev

 Let Me In: A relatively faithful American adaptation of the Swedish vampire film Let The right One In. So faithful—at times seemingly shot-for-shot—it begs a series of questions: 

  • Why bother to set it in America?
  • Given change in location, why keep it set in 1983?
  • If you’re going to be so faithful about certain aesthetic aspects, why jettison the element that made the original so intriguing ambiguity?

Though it’s laudable Hollywood didn’t Hollywoodize the film, it’s ultimately a kind of pointless exercise. Rather than bringing this story to a wider English-speaking North American audience, they still ended up making the kind of film that would generally appeal to people who aren’t turned off by reading subtitles. Only this time they did it with two leads who, though really pretty good, are just a few ticks less interesting than their Swedish counterparts. At best, anyone who sees this version first will probably want to see the mesmerizing original but will have had the experience spoiled for them slightly.

I had the unexpected sensation of actually wishing they’d bastardized Let The Right One In into some kind of Near Dark meets Twilight mess because then at least I’d be able to say, “Well, I guess they really did have to dumb it down for American audiences,” and then just enjoy it for whatever piece of crap it is.

Of course, if they had gone that route, I’d probably actually have been pissing blood on it, calling their version a travesty. So…

pandorum01

 Cargo: This is a Swiss mash-up of Alien and The Matrix. Yeah, that second reference is a spoiler but they telegraph it so far in advance you’re spending half the film clawing at the screen willing the characters to figure out the obvious. Definite pacing issues. Also, the horror/suspense “hunted by something unknown in dark corridors” element should have been cut in favour of the main sci-fi story. It felt entirely shoe-horned in like they thought you simply can’t have a space voyage movie without it. Since it was ultimately inconsequential to the over-arching story, it wasn’t even thrilling. Otherwise, Cargo is not a the worst twist on the something-goes-terribly-wrong-on-a-long-space-voyage trope—but the bar is set pretty low.

 Pandorum: This is another something-goes-terribly-wrong-on-a-long-space-voyage film, of course recommended to me after watching Cargo. Reading the synopsis, I wondered if it was actually a Hollywood remake of Cargo so I gave in to my curiosity. It’s not a remake, but it’s another film in this sci-fi sub-genre that probably could have done without the “hunted by something unknown in dark corridors” element and been stronger.

Of course, then it’d be more Silent Running meets Event Horizon and less Aliens meets Event Horizon. Maybe that wouldn’t have been significantly better. Still, as with Cargo, it felt like they were making two different movies and sandwiching them together. The titular space madness “pandorum” didn’t add much to the sort of Noah’s Ark gone Planet of the Apes story, only distracted from it.

♦ The Covenant: This coming of age wizard boy tale was nowhere near as bad as I expected it to be. That said, the mythology they spin is absurd. They boys get their first powers at 13 and then “ascend” into their full power on their 18th birthday. Why? Why exactly those years? Why don’t some of them “ascend” at 17 and a half and some not until they’re 20? It makes for a tidy narrative but feels just a little too convenient.

The film also, naturally, sets itself up as a trite explanation for the Salem witch trials. But since it’s an entirely magical lineage they don’t explain why so many women were burned as witches. Not that any of it’s that important to the story, it’s just a little background decoration I found distracting.

Anyway, there’s a bigger issue with how they try to make a mystery of the identity of the baddie since it’s obvious who it is from the first scene and the hamfisted “whodunit” element gets tiresome. A little more sinister foreshadowing of his intentions would have been more interesting than the smelly red herrings. On the plus side, his motivations are more believable than Voldemort’s genocidal thirst for vengeance.

predators-wallpapers_19903_1920x1200

 Predators: A nice twist on this established franchise sequel (reboot?) is making it an “arena games” film. Unfortunately, they don’t do as much with the concept as they could have.

By the time the Predator aliens show up, they feel kind of sutured onto the script and interrupt the ensemble character dynamics that were just beginning to develop. It feels like they ran out of time to do anything with the stock characters they populated the story with so each character ends up being a two-dimensional cliché instead of an interesting twist on an archetype. Not that the actors’ performances aren’t all pretty solid, but I kept feeling like “Oh he’s that prerequisite character. And she’s that kind of character” instead of getting getting sucked into their story.

There’s also an infuriatingly telegraphed character twist which they didn’t even try to disguise, yet seem to expect the audience to be shocked by the big reveal in the finale. Anyway, if the elements of this film were arrows, they mostly hit about two rings away from the bulls-eye. Which is actually more frustrating to watch than if they missed the target completely.

 Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter: This actually made me want to watch Spielberg’s Lincoln, which I’d previously had zero interest in. Or, rather, it made me wish I’d watched it first so I could be in on all clearly very clever dove-tailing of historical events with the vampire story. As I’m not as up on the mythology of Lincoln as much as was required, I mostly found myself wishing it was a straight-up Civil War era vampire film. Though maybe without the irreverent treatment of history, the film wouldn’t have been as fun and just kind of ridiculous. There’s a truly absurd action sequence involving a stampede of horses which was unlike anything I’d ever seen. So there’s that.

 Pumpkinhead: There’s probably no point in writing/reading a review of a 1988 monster/slasher. You know what to expect and what you expect is what you get. Except, perhaps, Lance Henriksen is little bit younger and less grizzly than you usually see him. And perhaps it’s disappointing “Pumpkinhead” doesn’t actually have a pumpkin for a head. Disapointing enough that I paused it midway to get a drink and forgot to watch the rest.

Advertisements

15 Responses to Netflix Follies: Let Me In, Cargo, Pandorum, Predators, more

  1. In Pandorum the passengers went insane and turned to cannibalism. Without Pandorum there would have not been any cannibals.

    Talked all about it here.

    http://anarchyreviews.blogspot.com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft.html

    • nerdhurdles says:

      In the film, the theory put forward is that the environment-triggered genetic modifications, designed to help the passengers adapt for survival on the new planet, were triggered by the environment of the ship and turned them that way. It’s safe to assume that “pandorum” played a role in that evolution, but it wasn’t needed. I still feel like they were trying to tell a Moon-like space psychosis story with Gallo glued to an Aliens-like bug hunt. The result was messy and unfocussed.

      • And that theory was cleary wrong as 923 years went by, meaning that they weren’t the passengers. It was also questioned why Leland who had been awake for years did not changed and there is also Gallo who was awake for at least over a decade didn’t change at all. The enyzme was stated to jump start evolution which is a process that happens over generations so they were the descendants of the passengers.

        The drawings on the walls in Leland’s lair implied that it was Pandorum and Gallo’s influence that made the creature’s ancestors act like crazy cannibals. They were just fellowing tradition. It was needed, otherwise how would highly educated people become raving maniacs instead of just maintaining their civilization as most have done over the last few thousand years? Evolution would not have done that. I explained it in the link I posted.

      • Nerd Hurdles says:

        Yeah, they were the descendants of the passengers, that was clear in the film. Also, Leland says he’s changing, or that they will change. Perhaps he’s referring to pandorum though.

        My point is that the enzyme could have been used to explain the evolution without the existence pandorum—either because the enzyme reacted poorly in the ship’s environment or that it was faulty in its design and (unforeseen by the scientists who designed it) would turn people into blue-skinned, black-eyed cannibals over 923 years.

        That would have made for a much tighter narrative.

        (I also doubted that a completely cannibalistic species prone to unrestrained rage could sustain any kind of population over more than a few years.)

  2. Btw, Cargo came out the same year as Pandorum.

  3. Khalil A. R. Kersey says:

    I have seen the film several time and Leland never stated that he was changing. If the movie played on that idea it would have been the “Science Experiment Gone Horribly Wrong” cliche. The fact that the passengers went insane and tried to create a new species due to the mistrust of their own human nature is far more compelling in my eyes.

  4. Khalil A. R. Kersey says:

    Or are you referring to the deleted scene where Bower says “We’re becoming one of them”?

  5. nerdhurdles says:

    I only watched it the once, but he definitely says something, when he’s dishing out the soup, to the effect of “You don’t know how this place changes you.” Having seen it so many times, you can probably remember verbatim what he actually says. Ultimately, I don;t think it’s that important whether he says it or not.

    Anyway, The movie basically still is a “Science Experiment Gone Horribly Wrong” cliche, with insane passengers or not.

    The fact that the passengers went insane and tried to create a new species due to the mistrust of their own human nature is just a shaky premise in my eyes. I read your multiple (!) blog posts on the film and I feel like you’re reading a lot into it which isn’t supported by what’s on the screen.

    And even if it’s attempting to do what you claim, which I’m willing to admit it is, sure, it simply would have been better off having been trimmed down in the script editing phase. Not that there aren’t compelling ideas there, but they seem underdeveloped and play against each other instead of working together. For instance, the psychological drama with the two Gallos falls flat and interrupts the momentum of the action story.

    After all, it’s basically a bug hunt action/suspense flick, not Moon or Solaris.

  6. Director/Co-writers confirmed that the theme of the film is indeed survival.

    Not necessarily a “Science Experiment Gone Horribly Wrong”. That would imply that there were miscalculations with the enzyme. Of course nothing was wrong with the enzyme itself but the people it was given to.

    The two Gallo scene is pretty much just used as a red herring to make the audience think the ship is still in space as I noted in my blog. They talk about “the stars all look alike” and ” launching yourself into space” in those scenes to give ous that impression. It’s more of a mystery movie than a action film.

    • nerdhurdles says:

      I’d say the enzyme resulting any outcomes counter to the intended, in any way whatsoever, could be considered a “science experiment gone wrong” trope.

      I don’t think the two Gallo scene exists to be a red herring, but just to use the old Fight Club/Dead Ringers dissociative disorder gimmick. Which has since ceased to be an interesting plot twist and is about on par with “it was all a dream” as far as narrative devices go. At least, I always feel a little annoyed and ripped-off when it turns out one character was all in another’s head.

      But if they were going to go that route, I just really think it could have been developed into something much more interesting if less screen time had been given to Bower’s story—and vice versa.

  7. Khalil A. R. Kersey says:

    Yeah, I was annoyed by that twist as well. But the full reveal of what happened made up for it for me.

    I agree that this movie could have better. Maybe even better as a TV series.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: